别让你的食谱“逼”自己太紧

春节大餐顿顿过后，身体“肿”的开始抗议，多少人打开搜索引擎并给自己定下要科学、自律饮食的目标。而实际上，不要再逼自己喝下浓稠油绿的蔬菜汁了，看文章告诉你正确的饮食平衡。

测试中可能遇到的词汇和知识：

quinoa藜麦['kiːnəʊə; kwɪ'nəʊə]

wintry冬天的['wɪntrɪ]

immaculate完美的[ɪ'mækjʊlət]

irreproachable无瑕疵的[ɪrɪ'prəʊtʃəb(ə)l]

unhinged精神错乱的[ʌn'hindʒd]

self-loathing自我厌弃

How to diet: don’t try too hard（701 words）

By Bee Wilson

In this wintry season of resolutions,it is not enough any more for a plate of food to be good. For many in the grip of this or that diet philosophy,every meal must aspire to be immaculately balanced: protein-boosted and containing a full rainbow of vegetables. But perfect is the enemy of the good,as the philosopher Voltaire said. A cold,unseasoned“wellness bowl”of quinoa,sliced tofu,avocado and sprouted mung beans may be irreproachably balanced. But it isn’t half as enjoyable to eat as the kind of hearty dinner that considers flavour first and nutrition after,whether that’s a plate of eggs Florentine with toast or a dish of smoky-rich black dhal with fluffy white rice.

If a balanced diet is so healthy,why does the pursuit of it drive so many of us nuts? As an overweight and self-loathing teenager,I was a sucker for the perfect diet. But my projects for flawless eating would start with carrots and hope before ending,a few days later,in pastries and despair. In the name of“balance”（which is often a synonym for thinness),otherwise sensible people do crazy things,like force down a vat of green juiced slime in order to tick off three of their five-a-day in one go. There are even those now who swear that not-eating might be a more balanced form of nutrition than eating. Huel is a strange milkshake-like meal replacement made from oats,pea protein and a bunch of other stuff（the American equivalent is Soylent),which advertises itself as“nutritionally complete food”. The implication is that proper food — the tasty stuff that we spear with a fork — is woefully incomplete.

The idea of eating for the sake of balance could always look a little unhinged. As the food writer MFK Fisher complained in her 1942 book How to Cook a Wolf,there was a tendency in mid-20th century America for“meal-balancing”. This meant combining“a lot of dull and sometimes actively hostile foods”in a single meal,purely for the sake of covering your nutritional bases. Fisher found it“stupid”that so many Americans felt they needed to start the day with a monotonous gamut of juice,coffee,hot or cold cereal,“eggs and cured pork in any of about four ways”,lest they might be lacking in anything.

Now,if anything,our idea of balanced eating is even more counterproductive. It’s become less about how many nutritious foods you can cram on a plate and more about how many things you can cut out. Many people — influenced by clean-eating gurus — have become convinced that there is such a thing as an absolutely good or absolutely bad food. Entire food groups — from carbohydrates to dairy — are expunged from the diet in the name of balance and glow,as if the tiniest nibble of bagel might set you off kilter. This is a dangerous kind of balance to pursue.

Such paranoid reactions are to be expected,however,in a food supply which has itself become colossally unbalanced,mostly because it is drowning in sweetness. You try to buy a“healthy”snack only to discover that your“protein bar”is basically a brownie with pretensions. Given we live in a world in which sugar is present in 80 per cent of all supermarket foods and newsagents push you to buy a 200g slab of chocolate when all you wanted was a magazine,it’s time to take balance back in our own hands.

We must each find our own equilibrium when it comes to food. MFK Fisher wisely said that we should aim to“balance the day,not each meal in the day”. A balanced diet might mean spinach and chickpea soup for lunch but spaghetti and clams with a delicious salad for dinner. Real balance means navigating the bewildering food environment we live in and still finding a way to eat with gusto and joy. It means staying on an even keel — not starving,not bingeing — and ignoring any voices that promise you a perfect diet. It means worrying less about the balance of proteins to carbs in your body and more about the balance of oil to vinegar in your vinaigrette.

1.In Fisher’s book,when was there a tendency in America for“meal-balancing”?

A. in mid-19th century

B. in mid-20th century

C. in early of 19th century

D. in early of 20th century

答案(1)

2.What is Fisher’opinion about those Americans who are worried if they don’t have balanced meal？

A. Stupid

B. Autonomic

C. Useless

D. Understandable

答案(2)

3.What is the key point of this article？

A. We should start a day with a balanced meal

B. A meal should contain all kind of nutrition

C. We should eat less sweet and chocolate

D. Our idea of balanced eating is even more counterproductive.

答案(3)

4.What is not the real balanced diet according to the article？

A. Balance the day,not each meal in the day

B. Follow the voice which promise you a perfect diet

C. Staying on an even keel — not starving,not bingeing

D. Navigating the bewildering food environment we live in and still finding a way to eat with gusto and joy

答案(4)

(1) 答案：B.in mid-20th century

解释：在Fisher的书中提到20世纪中期的美国开始了注重饮食平衡的趋势。

(2) 答案：A.Stupid

解释：Fisher认为，如果因为没有平衡的饮食便产生焦虑，觉得自己缺少营养是愚蠢的想法。

(3) 答案：D.Our idea of balanced eating is even more counterproductive.

解释：我们对平衡饮食的认识有些起反向作用。

(4) 答案：B.Follow the voice which promise you a perfect diet

解释：阐述了作者关于正确的饮食平衡的观点。